Processor N100 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1518 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Alder Lake-N |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $128 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core |
| Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | P | BGA1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Processor N100.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Processor N100 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by 458% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 outperforms Processor N100 by 195% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
Processor N100 has an age advantage of 14 years, 100% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Processor N100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
