Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiencyno data3.11
Architecture codenameMerom-2M (2008)Thuban (2010)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)1 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data346 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPAM3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2008 1 May 2010
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 has 171.4% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 285 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1620 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1400 or Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.