Core 2 Quad Q9500 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Quad Q9500 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a whopping 226% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3250 | 2496 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.44 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | no data |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (17 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core 2 Quad Q9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.83 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 71 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core 2 Quad Q9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | P | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core 2 Quad Q9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core 2 Quad Q9500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core 2 Quad Q9500 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.39 | 1.27 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 95 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9500 has a 225.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 438.9% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q9500 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
