Xeon E-2314 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Xeon E-2314 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Xeon E-2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Xeon E-2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Xeon E-2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Xeon E-2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Xeon E-2314 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Xeon E-2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Xeon E-2314.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482
Xeon E-2314 8146
+1590%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 8 September 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has 550% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2314, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Xeon E-2314. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2314 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Xeon E-2314, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Intel Xeon E-2314
Xeon E-2314

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 or Xeon E-2314, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.