Duron 800 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Duron 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3111not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Duron
Power efficiency2.84no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Spitfire (2000−2001)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)17 October 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$170

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Duron 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz0.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz200 MT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1 MB64 KB
Chip lithography45 nm180 nm
Die size107 mm2105.68 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million25 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Duron 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA956A
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Duron 800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Duron 800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 17 October 2000
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Duron 800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is a notebook processor while Duron 800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Duron 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
AMD Duron 800
Duron 800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Duron 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 or Duron 800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.