Core 2 Duo E6420 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo E6420 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Core 2 Duo E6420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3126 | 2923 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.75 | 0.68 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | April 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Core 2 Duo E6420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.13 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 111 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 60 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 167 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Core 2 Duo E6420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Core 2 Duo E6420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Core 2 Duo E6420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Core 2 Duo E6420 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Core 2 Duo E6420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.29 | 0.47 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.
Core 2 Duo E6420, on the other hand, has a 62.1% higher aggregate performance score.
The Core 2 Duo E6420 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Duo E6420 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Core 2 Duo E6420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
