Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs AMD A9-9425

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

Comparing A9-9425 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1881not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date31 May 2016 (7 years old)1 September 2009 (14 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134
Current price$561 no data

Technical specs

A9-9425 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size124.5 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT4BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133 RAM, Virtualizationno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A9-9425 1505
+212%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482

A9-9425 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by 212% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A9-9425 2686
+115%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1250

A9-9425 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by 115% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A9-9425 4338
+82.3%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 2380

A9-9425 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by 82% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A9-9425 2314
+131%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1000

A9-9425 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by 131% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 31 May 2016 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between A9-9425 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9425
A9-9425
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1478 votes

Rate AMD A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425 or Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.