m3-8100Y vs Celeron D 350
Primary details
Comparing Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2003 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Core m3 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 34.10 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) |
| Release date | June 2005 (19 years ago) | 30 August 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $281 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.25V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FCBGA1515 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| My WiFi | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Smart Response | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | - | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | - | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 33.3 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
| Max video memory | no data | 16 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 900 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 3840x2160@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 10 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 5 Watt |
m3-8100Y has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1360% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron D 350 is a desktop processor while Core m3-8100Y is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 350 and Core m3-8100Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
