Sempron 3400+ vs Celeron D 340

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing Celeron D 340 and Sempron 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Palermo (2001)
Release dateSeptember 2004 (19 years ago)1 October 2005 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$30
Current price$169 $25 (0.8x MSRP)

Technical specs

Celeron D 340 and Sempron 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.93 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache16 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB128 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size109 mm2103 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 million63 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 340 and Sempron 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478939
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 340 and Sempron 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron D 340 and Sempron 3400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 340 and Sempron 3400+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 340 and Sempron 3400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Advantages and disadvantages


Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 62 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 340 and Sempron 3400+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 340 and Sempron 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 340
Celeron D 340
AMD Sempron 3400+
Sempron 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 12 votes

Rate Celeron D 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 14 votes

Rate Sempron 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 340 or Sempron 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.