Celeron 420 vs D 335

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 335 and Celeron 420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$23

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 335 and Celeron 420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache16 KB64 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size109 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data60 °C
Number of transistors125 million105 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4V1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 335 and Celeron 420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 335 and Celeron 420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron D 335 and Celeron 420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 335 and Celeron 420 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 335 and Celeron 420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 420 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 108.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 335 and Celeron 420. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 335 and Celeron 420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 335
Celeron D 335
Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 28 votes

Rate Celeron D 335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 169 votes

Rate Celeron 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 335 or Celeron 420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.