Xeon W-1390 vs Celeron D 325
Primary details
Comparing Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 461 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 65.84 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 17.80 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| Release date | June 2004 (20 years ago) | 6 May 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $494 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | 276 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.25V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | - | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 50 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
| Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.3 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 32 |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 5120 x 3200 @60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 5120 x 3200 @60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 80 Watt |
Celeron D 325 has 9.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon W-1390, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron D 325 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-1390 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 325 and Xeon W-1390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
