i9-10900 vs Celeron D 325

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data18.14
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Comet Lake (2020)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache16 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size109 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors125 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB-+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.2 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 65 Watt

i9-10900 has 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 325 and Core i9-10900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 325
Celeron D 325
Intel Core i9-10900
Core i9-10900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 18 votes

Rate Celeron D 325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 378 votes

Rate Core i9-10900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 325 or Core i9-10900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.