i7-9800X vs Celeron D 325
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 870 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.69 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.68 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| Release date | June 2004 (21 years ago) | 19 October 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $589 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron D 325 and Core i7-9800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 38 |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.25V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron D 325 and Core i7-9800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FCLGA2066 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i7-9800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron D 325 and Core i7-9800X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i7-9800X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i7-9800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i7-9800X.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 44 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 165 Watt |
Celeron D 325 has 126% lower power consumption.
i7-9800X, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron D 325 and Intel Core i7-9800X. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
