i3-N305 vs Celeron D 325

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1059
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiencyno data39.64
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed2.53 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache16 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size109 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C105 °C
Number of transistors125 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB-no data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 15 Watt

i3-N305 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and 386.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron D 325 is a desktop processor while Core i3-N305 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 325 and Core i3-N305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 325
Celeron D 325
Intel Core i3-N305
Core i3-N305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 18 votes

Rate Celeron D 325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 607 votes

Rate Core i3-N305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 325 or Core i3-N305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.