Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs Celeron B860E
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1486 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.75 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.58 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | no data | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $363 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron B860E and Xeon E5-2608L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | QPI |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 2 × 6.4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 21 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 246.24 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | 3200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron B860E and Xeon E5-2608L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B860E and Xeon E5-2608L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron B860E and Xeon E5-2608L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B860E and Xeon E5-2608L v4 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B860E and Xeon E5-2608L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 1,536 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B860E and Xeon E5-2608L v4.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
Celeron B860E has 42.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2608L v4, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron B860E and Intel Xeon E5-2608L v4. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron B860E is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2608L v4 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
