Athlon 300U vs Celeron B840

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B840
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.61
Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.42
+297%

Athlon 300U outperforms Celeron B840 by a whopping 297% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B840 and Athlon 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28041776
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.6515.28
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)6 January 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B840 and Athlon 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0PCIe 3.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1924
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B840 and Athlon 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketG2 (988B)FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B840 and Athlon 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron B840 and Athlon 300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B840 and Athlon 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B840 and Athlon 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 950 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B840 and Athlon 300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B840 0.61
Athlon 300U 2.42
+297%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B840 967
Athlon 300U 3863
+299%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 2.42
Integrated graphics card 0.34 2.99
Recency 1 July 2011 6 January 2019
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon 300U has a 296.7% higher aggregate performance score, 779.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B840 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B840 and Athlon 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B840
Celeron B840
AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 17 votes

Rate Celeron B840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 462 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B840 or Athlon 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.