Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Celeron B820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B820
2012, $86
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019, $1,399
24 cores / 48 threads, 280 Watt
30.99
+6637%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron B820 by a whopping 6637% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3169167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.01
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiencyno data11.89
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 July 2012 (13 years ago)25 November 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$1,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier1738
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988TR4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB256 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron B820 0.46
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 30.99
+6637%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron B820 817
Samples: 324
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 54760
+6603%
Samples: 1213

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron B820 279
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 1679
+502%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron B820 487
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 13168
+2604%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 30.99
Recency 1 July 2012 25 November 2019
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron B820 has 700% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, on the other hand, has a 6637% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron B820 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron B820 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B820
Celeron B820
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 155 votes

Rate Celeron B820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 132 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.