Core i7-13700H vs Celeron B820
Aggregate performance score
i7-13700H outperforms Celeron B820 by a whopping 3234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron B820 and Core i7-13700H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2753 | 328 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Raptor Lake-H |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Raptor Lake-H |
| Release date | 31 July 2011 (12 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
| Current price | $34 (0.4x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron B820 and Core i7-13700H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 1.2 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 11.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron B820 and Core i7-13700H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | PGA988 | BGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B820 and Core i7-13700H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron B820 and Core i7-13700H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B820 and Core i7-13700H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B820 and Core i7-13700H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B820 and Core i7-13700H.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-13700H outperforms Celeron B820 by 3234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-13700H outperforms Celeron B820 by 3233% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.53 | 17.67 |
| Recency | 31 July 2011 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Threads | 2 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron B820 has 28.6% lower power consumption.
i7-13700H, on the other hand, has a 3234% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 600% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i7-13700H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B820 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B820 and Core i7-13700H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
