i7-10750H vs Celeron B820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B820
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53
Core i7-10750H
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.68
+1349%

i7-10750H outperforms Celeron B820 by a whopping 1349% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [_id] => 629
            [filename] => Turion-II-Ultra-M620
            [title] => AMD Turion II Ultra M620
            [manufacturer] => AMD
            [result] => 0.53
            [_number] => 2807
            [cores] => 2 / 2
            [custom_id] => 200
        )

)

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2805930
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Comet Lake
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date31 July 2011 (13 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$435

Detailed specifications

Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache2 MB12 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.15 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B820 0.53
i7-10750H 7.68
+1349%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B820 820
i7-10750H 11874
+1348%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron B820 281
i7-10750H 1452
+417%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron B820 491
i7-10750H 5346
+989%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 7.68
Recency 31 July 2011 2 April 2020
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron B820 has 28.6% lower power consumption.

i7-10750H, on the other hand, has a 1349.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-10750H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B820 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B820 and Core i7-10750H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B820
Celeron B820
Intel Core i7-10750H
Core i7-10750H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 131 vote

Rate Celeron B820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2110 votes

Rate Core i7-10750H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B820 or Core i7-10750H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.