i5-11400F vs Celeron B820

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B820
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52
Core i5-11400F
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.08
+2031%

Core i5-11400F outperforms Celeron B820 by a whopping 2031% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B820 and Core i5-11400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2871721
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.87
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.3615.61
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$157

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B820 and Core i5-11400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B820 and Core i5-11400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B820 and Core i5-11400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron B820 and Core i5-11400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B820 and Core i5-11400F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B820 and Core i5-11400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s50 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B820 and Core i5-11400F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B820 and Core i5-11400F.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B820 0.52
i5-11400F 11.08
+2031%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B820 802
i5-11400F 17029
+2023%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron B820 280
i5-11400F 1980
+607%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron B820 492
i5-11400F 7617
+1448%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 11.08
Recency 1 July 2012 16 March 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron B820 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i5-11400F, on the other hand, has a 2030.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-11400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B820 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron B820 is a notebook processor while Core i5-11400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B820 and Core i5-11400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B820
Celeron B820
Intel Core i5-11400F
Core i5-11400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 141 vote

Rate Celeron B820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8677 votes

Rate Core i5-11400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B820 or Core i5-11400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.