EPYC 72F3 vs Celeron B810E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B810E and EPYC 72F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated375
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.57
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data9.01
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Milan (2021−2023)
Release dateno data15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$2,468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B810E and EPYC 72F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1637
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size131 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors504 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B810E and EPYC 72F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
Socketno dataSP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B810E and EPYC 72F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B810E and EPYC 72F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B810E and EPYC 72F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B810E and EPYC 72F3.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 180 Watt

Celeron B810E has 414.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 72F3, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron B810E and EPYC 72F3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron B810E is a notebook processor while EPYC 72F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B810E and EPYC 72F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B810E
Celeron B810E
AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron B810E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B810E or EPYC 72F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.