EPYC Embedded 3251 vs Celeron B810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3135not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency0.53no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 March 2011 (14 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$315

Detailed specifications

Celeron B810 and EPYC Embedded 3251 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1625
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B810 and EPYC Embedded 3251 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA988TR4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B810 and EPYC Embedded 3251. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B810 and EPYC Embedded 3251 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B810 and EPYC Embedded 3251 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B810 and EPYC Embedded 3251. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size16.6 GB512 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B810 and EPYC Embedded 3251 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B810 and EPYC Embedded 3251.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2011 21 February 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

Celeron B810 has 42.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3251, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron B810 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3251. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron B810 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3251 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B810
Celeron B810
AMD EPYC Embedded 3251
EPYC Embedded 3251

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Celeron B810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3251 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron B810 and EPYC Embedded 3251, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.