Athlon MP 1600+ vs Celeron B800
Primary details
Comparing Celeron B800 and Athlon MP 1600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2987 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Athlon MP |
| Power efficiency | 1.13 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 19 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 15 October 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | $210 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron B800 and Athlon MP 1600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | FSB |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 15 | 10.5 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 128 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | 38 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron B800 and Athlon MP 1600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | G2 (988B) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 62.8 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B800 and Athlon MP 1600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron B800 and Athlon MP 1600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B800 and Athlon MP 1600+ are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B800 and Athlon MP 1600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 June 2011 | 15 October 2001 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 62 Watt |
Celeron B800 has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 462.5% more advanced lithography process, and 77.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron B800 and Athlon MP 1600+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron B800 is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 1600+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B800 and Athlon MP 1600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
