Athlon Gold 7220C vs Celeron B800
Primary details
Comparing Celeron B800 and Athlon Gold 7220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2991 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
Power efficiency | 1.14 | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
Release date | 19 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron B800 and Athlon Gold 7220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 15 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 504 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron B800 and Athlon Gold 7220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | G2 (988B) | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B800 and Athlon Gold 7220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
FMA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron B800 and Athlon Gold 7220C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B800 and Athlon Gold 7220C are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B800 and Athlon Gold 7220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz) | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.34 | 2.86 |
Recency | 19 June 2011 | 23 May 2023 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Athlon Gold 7220C has 741.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more threads, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron B800 and Athlon Gold 7220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B800 and Athlon Gold 7220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.