Ryzen Embedded 5950E vs Celeron 947UE
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Designer | Intel | AMD |
Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
Release date | 20 January 2013 (12 years ago) | 20 April 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Embedded 5950E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 32 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.05 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 1024 KB | 64 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
Die size | 118 mm2 | 2x 74 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 8,300 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Embedded 5950E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | Intel BGA1023 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Embedded 5950E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Embedded 5950E are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Embedded 5950E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Embedded 5950E.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 20 January 2013 | 20 April 2023 |
Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
Threads | 1 | 32 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 105 Watt |
Celeron 947UE has 517.6% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Embedded 5950E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 947UE and AMD Ryzen Embedded 5950E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 947UE is a notebook processor while Ryzen Embedded 5950E is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.