EPYC Embedded 3401 vs Celeron 947UE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 947UE and EPYC Embedded 3401 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 947UE and EPYC Embedded 3401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.85 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 18.5 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1536 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 1024 KB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 947UE and EPYC Embedded 3401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 947UE and EPYC Embedded 3401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 947UE and EPYC Embedded 3401 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 947UE and EPYC Embedded 3401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 January 2013 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 85 Watt |
Celeron 947UE has 400% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 3401, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 947UE and EPYC Embedded 3401. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 947UE is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3401 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 947UE and EPYC Embedded 3401, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
