EPYC 7573X vs Celeron 947UE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 947UE and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 51 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.74 |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Milan-X (2022) |
| Release date | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 947UE and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1024 KB | 768 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 947UE and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 947UE and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 947UE and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 947UE and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 947UE and EPYC 7573X.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 January 2013 | 22 March 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 280 Watt |
Celeron 947UE has 1547.1% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7573X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 947UE and EPYC 7573X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 947UE is a notebook processor while EPYC 7573X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 947UE and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
