Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Celeron 927UE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 927UE and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 521 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 47.69 |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) | 1 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 927UE and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 54 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 927UE and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 927UE and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 927UE and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz) | AMD Radeon 880M |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.63 | 20.03 |
| Recency | 1 January 2013 | 1 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron 927UE has 64.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has 3079.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 927UE and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 927UE and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
