Ryzen 5 2500X vs Celeron 927UE
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1344 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.79 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 1 January 2013 (12 years ago) | 1 October 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 927UE and Ryzen 5 2500X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 36 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 927UE and Ryzen 5 2500X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | BGA | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 256 KB + 1 MB | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 927UE and Ryzen 5 2500X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 927UE and Ryzen 5 2500X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 927UE and Ryzen 5 2500X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz) | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 927UE and Ryzen 5 2500X.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2013 | 1 October 2018 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 256 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2500X has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 83.3% more advanced lithography process, and 293.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 927UE and AMD Ryzen 5 2500X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 927UE is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2500X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
