Processor CC150 vs Celeron 927UE
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 1 January 2013 (13 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Celeron 927UE and Processor CC150: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 180.3 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 927UE and Processor CC150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 927UE and Processor CC150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 927UE and Processor CC150 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 927UE and Processor CC150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 927UE and Processor CC150.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron 927UE has 459% lower power consumption.
Processor CC150, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 927UE and Intel Processor CC150. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 927UE is a notebook processor while Processor CC150 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
