Opteron 856 vs Celeron 927UE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 927UE and Opteron 856 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Athens (2003−2006)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 927UE and Opteron 856 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB1 MB
L3 cache1 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 927UE and Opteron 856 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data8
SocketBGA940
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt92 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 927UE and Opteron 856. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 92 Watt

Celeron 927UE has a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 441.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 927UE and Opteron 856. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 927UE is a notebook processor while Opteron 856 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 927UE and Opteron 856, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 927UE
Celeron 927UE
AMD Opteron 856
Opteron 856

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 927UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Opteron 856 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 927UE or Opteron 856, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.