Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs Celeron 927UE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2839 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.57 |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) | September 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512K |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 220 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 89 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 89 Watt |
Celeron 927UE has a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 423.5% lower power consumption.
Athlon 64 X2 5200+, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 927UE is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 X2 5200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
