EPYC 9335 vs Celeron 897
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 897 and EPYC 9335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | no data | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,178 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 897 and EPYC 9335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 16 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 4x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | 33,260 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 897 and EPYC 9335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 210 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 897 and EPYC 9335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 897 and EPYC 9335 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 897 and EPYC 9335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 897 and EPYC 9335.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 210 Watt |
Celeron 897 has 1135.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9335, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 897 and EPYC 9335. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 897 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9335 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 897 and EPYC 9335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
