Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 vs Celeron 887E
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Gorgon Point |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 887E and Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 15 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 887E and Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 887E and Ryzen AI 9 HX 475. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 887E and Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 887E and Ryzen AI 9 HX 475. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 54 Watt |
Celeron 887E has 217.6% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 887E and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
