EPYC 9655 vs Celeron 887E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 887E and EPYC 9655 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Turin (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,852

Detailed specifications

Celeron 887E and EPYC 9655 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size131 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors504 Million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 887E and EPYC 9655 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 887E and EPYC 9655. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 887E and EPYC 9655 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 887E and EPYC 9655. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 887E and EPYC 9655.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron 887E has 2252.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655, on the other hand, has 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 887E and EPYC 9655. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 887E is a notebook processor while EPYC 9655 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 887E and EPYC 9655, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 887E
Celeron 887E
AMD EPYC 9655
EPYC 9655

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 887E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 12 votes

Rate EPYC 9655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 887E or EPYC 9655, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.