Xeon Phi 7210F vs Celeron 877

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3260not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Knights Landing (2016)
Release date1 July 2012 (13 years ago)20 June 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 877 and Xeon Phi 7210F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2256
Base clock speed1.4 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier14no data
L1 cache64K (per core)32 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 877 and Xeon Phi 7210F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA10233647
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt230 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 877 and Xeon Phi 7210F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 877 and Xeon Phi 7210F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 877 and Xeon Phi 7210F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 877 and Xeon Phi 7210F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 877 and Xeon Phi 7210F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 877 and Xeon Phi 7210F.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 20 June 2016
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 256
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 230 Watt

Celeron 877 has 1252.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7210F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 3100% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 877 and Intel Xeon Phi 7210F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 877 is a notebook processor while Xeon Phi 7210F is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 877
Celeron 877
Intel Xeon Phi 7210F
Xeon Phi 7210F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17 votes

Rate Celeron 877 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7210F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 877 and Xeon Phi 7210F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.