Ryzen 5 3600X vs Celeron 877

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated659
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier14no data
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cache2 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023AM4
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors-
Clear Video--
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 877 692
Ryzen 5 3600X 18195
+2529%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 877 242
Ryzen 5 3600X 1670
+590%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 877 457
Ryzen 5 3600X 7105
+1455%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 27 May 2019
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron 877 has 458.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3600X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 877 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3600X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 877 and Ryzen 5 3600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 877
Celeron 877
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Ryzen 5 3600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17 votes

Rate Celeron 877 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2683 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 877 or Ryzen 5 3600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.