Pentium 4 HT 3.00 vs Celeron 847E
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3286 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.82 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | no data | April 2003 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $111 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron 847E and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 11 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | 55 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 847E and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 82 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847E and Pentium 4 HT 3.00. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847E and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847E and Pentium 4 HT 3.00. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 82 Watt |
Celeron 847E has 100% more physical cores, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 382.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 847E and Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.00. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 847E is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 HT 3.00 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
