EPYC 8324PN vs Celeron 847

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3365	1403
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	1.55
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	0.72	1.55
Designer	Intel	AMD
Manufacturer	Intel	TSMC
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Siena (2023−2024)
Release date	19 June 2011 (14 years ago)	18 September 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$134	$2,125

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8324PN has 15400% better value for money than Celeron 847.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847 and EPYC 8324PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads	2	64
Base clock speed	1.1 GHz	2.05 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.1 GHz	3 GHz
Bus type	DMI 2.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	11	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	5 nm
Die size	131 mm2	4x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	85 °C
Number of transistors	504 million	35,500 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847 and EPYC 8324PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCBGA1023	SP6
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and EPYC 8324PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	+	-
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron 847 and EPYC 8324PN technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and EPYC 8324PN are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and EPYC 8324PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5
Maximum memory size	16 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21.335 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)	N/A
Graphics max frequency	800 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and EPYC 8324PN integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	2	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
SDVO	+	no data
CRT	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and EPYC 8324PN.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	16	96

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.29	4.75
Recency	19 June 2011	18 September 2023
Physical cores	2	32
Threads	2	64
Chip lithography	32 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	130 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---