Ryzen Threadripper 3980X vs Celeron 837
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | no data | 14 November 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Celeron 837 and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 18 | 32 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 837 and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 837 and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 837 and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 837 and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 102.403 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 48 |
| Threads | 2 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 280 Watt |
Celeron 837 has 1547% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 3980X, on the other hand, has 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 357% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 837 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 837 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3980X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
