Atom x7405C vs Celeron 837

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 837 and Atom x7405C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Amston Lake (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$57

Detailed specifications

Celeron 837 and Atom x7405C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Number of transistors504 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 837 and Atom x7405C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 837 and Atom x7405C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 837 and Atom x7405C are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 837 and Atom x7405C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 837 and Atom x7405C.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 12 Watt

Atom x7405C has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 41.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 837 and Atom x7405C. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 837 and Atom x7405C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 837
Celeron 837
Intel Atom x7405C
Atom x7405C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 837 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7405C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 837 or Atom x7405C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.