Ryzen 5 2600X vs Celeron 807

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated796
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.38
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen+ (2018−2020)
Release date1 July 2012 (11 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$229
Current priceno data$153 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.25 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size131 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023AM4
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors-
Quick Sync Video--
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency950 MHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 807 392
Ryzen 5 2600X 13912
+3449%

Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Celeron 807 by 3449% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 19 April 2018
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 2 12
Cost $70 $229
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 95 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 807 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2600X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 807 and Ryzen 5 2600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 807
Celeron 807
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Ryzen 5 2600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Celeron 807 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2158 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 807 or Ryzen 5 2600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.