Atom Z650 vs Celeron 807

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 807 and Atom Z650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Atom
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Lincroft (2010−2011)
Release date	1 July 2012 (11 years ago)	11 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$70	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 807 and Atom Z650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	1.2 GHz
Bus support	no data	400 MT/s
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	1.5 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Die size	131 mm2	65 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	90 °C
Number of transistors	504 million	140 million
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 807 and Atom Z650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCBGA1023	T-PBGA518
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 807 and Atom Z650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3
AES-NI	-	no data
FMA	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Security technologies

Celeron 807 and Atom Z650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 807 and Atom Z650 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	-
VT-x	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 807 and Atom Z650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR2
Maximum memory size	16 GB	2.93 GB
Max memory channels	2	1
Maximum memory bandwidth	21.3 GB/s	3.2 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors	PowerVR SGX535
Graphics max frequency	950 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 807 and Atom Z650 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	2	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
LVDS	no data	+
SDVO	+	no data
CRT	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 807 and Atom Z650.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data
PCI support	no data	-

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 July 2012	11 April 2011
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	3 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 807 and Atom Z650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---