EPYC Embedded 3101 vs Celeron 797

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC Embedded
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1421
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA1023AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size16 GB512 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1632

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2012 21 February 2018
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 797 has 105.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3101, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 797 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3101 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 797 and EPYC Embedded 3101, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 797
Celeron 797
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
EPYC Embedded 3101

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 797 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 797 or EPYC Embedded 3101, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.