Ryzen 3 8300G vs Celeron 787

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.79
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data13.12
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$176

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier13no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size131 mm2137 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023AM5
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon 740M
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1614

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2011 8 January 2024
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 787 has 282.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 787 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 8300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 787 and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 787
Celeron 787
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 787 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 787 or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.