i7-9700F vs Celeron 787

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated902
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.69
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i7
Power efficiencyno data12.15
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$323

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1330
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2011 23 April 2019
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 787 has 282.4% lower power consumption.

i7-9700F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 787 is a notebook processor while Core i7-9700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 787 and Core i7-9700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 787
Celeron 787
Intel Core i7-9700F
Core i7-9700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 787 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 669 votes

Rate Core i7-9700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 787 or Core i7-9700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.