EPYC 9275F vs Celeron 7305

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2110not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency9.78no data
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-U (2022)Turin (2024)
Release date23 February 2022 (2 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,439

Detailed specifications

Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5 (Penta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads548
Base clock speedno data4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1744SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2022 10 October 2024
Physical cores 5 24
Threads 5 48
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 320 Watt

Celeron 7305 has 2033.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 380% more physical cores and 860% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 7305 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 7305 and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 7305
Celeron 7305
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 142 votes

Rate Celeron 7305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 7305 or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.