Xeon 7110M vs Celeron 725C
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 725C and Xeon 7110M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Tulsa (2006) |
| Release date | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) | August 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 725C and Xeon 7110M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 0 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 435 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 60 °C |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | 1328 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.1V-1.35V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 725C and Xeon 7110M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 725C and Xeon 7110M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 725C and Xeon 7110M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 725C and Xeon 7110M are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 725C and Xeon 7110M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron 725C has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 458.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon 7110M, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 725C and Xeon 7110M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 725C is a notebook processor while Xeon 7110M is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 725C and Xeon 7110M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
