EPYC 9335 vs Celeron 667

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 667 and EPYC 9335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameTimnaTurin (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,178

Detailed specifications

Celeron 667 and EPYC 9335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.67 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache32 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache128 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography180 nm4 nm
Die size129 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,260 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 667 and EPYC 9335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket370SSP5
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 667 and EPYC 9335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 667 and EPYC 9335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 667 and EPYC 9335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel i752N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 667 and EPYC 9335.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 32
Threads 1 64
Chip lithography 180 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 210 Watt

Celeron 667 has 600% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9335, on the other hand, has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 4400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 667 and EPYC 9335. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 667 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9335 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 667 and EPYC 9335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 667
Celeron 667
AMD EPYC 9335
EPYC 9335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 667 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 667 or EPYC 9335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.