Ultra 5 226V vs Celeron 667

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated659
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiencyno data65.68
Architecture codenameTimnaLunar Lake (2024)
Release dateno data24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads18
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.67 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache32 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache128 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography180 nm3 nm
Die size129 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket370SFCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel i752Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.85 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 180 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 5 226V has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 5900% more advanced lithography process, and 76.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 667 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 226V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 226V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 667
Celeron 667
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
Core Ultra 5 226V

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 667 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 226V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 667 or Core Ultra 5 226V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.